In Tennessee Senator Bob Corker supports "surgical" strikes, but is opposed to having troops involved. Senator Lamar Alexander says he will vote "no" because he says there is too much uncertainty about what comes next.
In Mississippi Senator Roger Wicker says he will vote no. Senator Thad Cochran is also leaning against military action but says he is still considering the President's arguments for it.
Finally, in Arkansas both Senator John Boozman and Senator Mark Pryor say they will vote no.
We want to know what you think. Should the U.S. strike Syria despite any deal to surrender chemical weapons?